Sudan
Location:
North-eastern Africa,
Area:
total: 1,861,484 sq km
land: NA
water: NA
Capital City;
Khartoum
Land boundaries:
Total: 6,819 km
border countries (7):
South Sudan 2,158 km
Chad 1,403 km,
Egypt 1,276 km,
Ethiopia 744 km,
Eritrea 682 km,
Libya 382 km,
Central African Republic 174 km
Coastline:853 km
Total: 7762 km

Sudan


Climate:
Hot and dry;
Arid desert;
Rainy season varies by region (April to November)
Terrain:
Generally flat, featureless plain;
Desert dominates the north
Elevation:
Mean elevation: 568 m
Elevation extremes: lowest point: the Red Sea 0 m
Highest point: Jabal Marrah 3,042 m
Natural resources:
petroleum;
small reserves of iron ore, copper, chromium ore, zinc, tungsten, mica, silver, gold;
Hydropower.
Land use:
agricultural land: 96%
arable land 15.7%; permanent crops 0.2%; permanent pasture 80%
forest: 1%
other: 3% (2011 est.)
Irrigated land:
18,900 sq km (2012)
Population – distribution:
With the exception of a ribbon of settlement that corresponds to the banks of the Nile, northern Sudan, which extends into the dry Sahara, is sparsely populated; more abundant vegetation and broader access to water increases population distribution in the south extending habitable range along nearly the entire border with South Sudan; sizeable areas of population are found around Khartoum, southeast between the Blue and White Nile Rivers, and throughout South Darfur.
Natural hazards:
dust storms and periodic persistent droughts

Sudan’s vast territory, coupled with its history of near-constant civil conflict, has made gathering precise demographic data a daunting task. According to the 2008 census, Sudan’s population totaled 39.2 million, of whom 30.9 million lived in the North and 8.3 million in the South. Of the total population, males slightly outnumbered females (at 20.1 million versus 19.1million); those aged 16 years and younger constituted 47.2 percent of the total, of whom 46.7 percent were in the North and 49.0 percent in the South. The U.S. Census Bureau’s estimate of Sudan’s midyear 2008 population was 40.2 million, with a birthrate of 34 births per 1,000, a death rate of 14 per 1,000, and a rate of growth about 2.1 percent.
As long as Sudan continues to grow at or near its current pace, it will rank among the world’s fastest-growing countries. While population models vary, the U.S. Census Bureau projected a population of 49.8 million in 2015 and 63.1 million in 2025. Despite these projections, the country’s population growth rate has been steadily declining and will likely continue to do so. The U.S. Census Bureau and the World Bank estimated that population growth peaked in the 1970s and 1980s at 3.2 and 3.3 percent, respectively, and that it has gradually fallen since that time. From 1990 to 2000, the population grew by 2.8 percent; by the early 2000s, the rate had declined to about 2.6 percent or lower. Sudan’s estimate of its annual population growth from 1983 to 2008 was 2.8 percent.
Experts predict that the population growth rate will fall below 2 percent sometime around 2020. Sudan had a population density in mid-2008 of only 16 persons per square kilometer, but this figure is misleading because much of Sudan is uninhabitable, and its people are unevenly distributed throughout the country. Roughly two-thirds of Sudan’s population resides within 300–500 kilometers of Khartoum and is concentrated around Khartoum and in Al-Gezira. Government estimates for 2007 showed that the country’s most densely populated states were Khartoum (16.7 percent), Al-Gezira (11.1 percent), and South Darfur (9.4 percent), a population distribution seemingly confirmed by the 2008 census. In the South, the 2008 census showed that the most populous states were Jonglei (1.4 million), Central Equatoria (ca. 1.2 million), and Warab (ca. 1.0 million). For the most part, only urban elites have knowledge of basic family-planning practices. Sudan does not have a national family-planning program.
Population:
37,345,935 (July 2017 est.)
Nationality:
Sudanese (singular and plural)
Ethnic groups:
Black 52%, Arab 39%, Beja 6%, Fur, Nuba, Fallata, and others 3% .
Languages:
Arabic (official), English (official), Nubian, Ta Bedawie, Fur.
Religions:
Sunni Muslim, small Christian minority.
Sudan’s ethnic and linguistic diversity is among the most complex in the world. Its nearly 600 ethnic groups speak more than 400 languages and dialects, many of them intelligible to only a small number of individuals. In recent decades, some of these small groups have been absorbed by larger groups, and migration often causes individuals reared in one tongue to converse only in the dominant language of the new area. Some linguistic groups have been absorbed by accommodation, others by conflict. In the case of migrants to the Three Towns, Arabic is the lingua franca even for Southerners, while the use of English continues to decline in quantity and quality.
The definition and boundaries of ethnic groups depend on how people perceive themselves and others. Language, cultural characteristics, and common ancestry may be used as markers of ethnic identity or difference, but they do not always define groups of people. Thus, the people called Atuot and the much larger group called Nuer speak essentially the same language, share many cultural characteristics, and acknowledge a common ancestry, but each group defines itself and the other as different.
Moreover, ethnic group names commonly used in Sudan and by foreign analysts are not always used by the people themselves. This fact is particularly true for non-Arab groups known by names coined by Arabs or by the British, who based the names on terms used by Arabs or others, not by the group itself. Thus, the Dinka and the Nuer, the largest groups in the South, call themselves, respectively, Jiang and Naadh, and not Dinka or Nuer. The distinction between Sudan’s Muslim and non-Muslim people has been of considerable importance in the country’s modern history and provides a preliminary ordering of ethnic groups. It does not, however, correspond in any simple way to distinctions based on linguistic, cultural, or racial criteria, nor to social or political solidarity.
Languages
Most languages spoken in Africa fall into four language superstocks. Three of them—Afro-Asiatic, Niger-Kordofanian, and NiloSaharan—are represented in Sudan. Each is divided into groups that are in turn subdivided into sets of closely related languages. Two or more major groups of each of the three superstocks are present in Sudan, historically both a north-south and an east-west migration crossroads. The most widely spoken language in Sudan is Arabic, a member of the Semitic branch of the Afro-Asiatic language family.
Cushitic, another major branch of Afro-Asiatic, is represented by Bedawiye (with several dialects), spoken by the largely nomadic Beja. Chadic, a third branch, is represented by its most important single language, Hausa, a West African tongue used in Nigeria by the Hausa themselves and employed by many other West Africans in Sudan as a lingua franca. Niger-Kordofanian is first divided into Niger-Congo and Kordofanian.
The widespread Niger-Congo language group includes many divisions and subdivisions of languages. Represented in Sudan are Azande and several other tongues of the Adamawa-Eastern language division, and Fulani of the West Atlantic division. The Kordofanian stock comprises only 30 to 40 languages spoken in a limited area of Sudan—the Nuba Mountains and their environs.
The designation of a Nilo-Saharan superstock has not been fully accepted by linguists, and its constituent groups and subgroups are not firmly fixed, in part because many of the languages have not been well studied.

Education
Schooling is compulsory for eight years of basic education. This may be followed by three years of general secondary school. At the secondary level, vocational programs for industrial, commercial, and agricultural studies are available for boys. Home economic programs are available for girls. The academic year runs from July to March.
Primary school enrollment in 2002 was estimated at less than 58% of age-eligible students; about 45% of those enrolled were girls. The same year, secondary school enrollment was less than 32% of age-eligible students. It is estimated that about 49% of all students complete their primary education. The student-to-teacher ratio for primary school was at about 29:1 in 2003; the ratio for secondary school was about 26:1.
The government of Sudan recognizes education as a right for every citizen and guarantees access to free basic education. Achieving the Education for All targets is considered a pre-requisite for achieving socio-economic stability in Sudan.
The vision of the Interim Education Sector Strategic Plan (ESSP) is to create a distinctive education system based on science and values, with an emphasis on improving the access to school, the quality of the education being received, as well as a strengthening of the country’s educational system.
The plan outlines three strategic pillars: Improve access to schooling for all including pre-school, basic and secondary education, technical and vocational, and out-of-school youth and adults; Improve quality of schooling at all levels; Strengthen the institutional capacity of the education system through curriculum renewal, learning assessments, system, teacher, and school management, and school health and nutrition.
Increase access to basic education through increasing capacity, reducing household costs, and encouraging demand; To provide access to general, technical and vocational education at secondary level to eligible basic school graduates and reduce disparities through; Building new schools in areas with low enrollment rates and new streams to existing schools in densely populated areas; Removing barriers that prevent successful basic education graduates from joining secondary education; and ensuring access for special groups by establishing boarding facilities for students and housing for teachers; Establishing new technical schools and vocational centers.
To improve quality of learning in basic education, especially in early literacy and numeracy through:
⦁ Improving the learning environment and teaching quality
⦁ Providing teaching and learning materials
⦁ Ensuring healthy learning environments
⦁ Strengthening school supervision
The University of Khartoum was established in 1956. A branch of Cairo University was opened at Khartoum in 1955. Other institutions include the Islamic University of Omdurman and the universities of El-Gezirah (at Wad Madanī) and Juba. In 1999, it was estimated that about 7% of the tertiary age population were enrolled in tertiary education programs. The adult literacy rate for 2004 was estimated at about 59%, with 69.2% for men and 49.9% for women.

Economy
Sudan has an agricultural economy, employing 80% of the workforce, holding considerable potential for irrigated production. Cotton and sesame account for almost a quarter each of export earnings. The livestock sector is sizable as well. However, droughts have led to famines, and civil war has led to the virtual collapse of the economy. The slave trade is alive and prospering in Sudan, operating at about $50 a head in 1999. It is estimated that in the south as many as one million civilians have died and more than five million have been uprooted because of civil war. Economic development is also hindered by a poor transportation system that increases the cost of transporting goods over long distances; Sudan is the largest country in Africa.
Sudan has experienced protracted social conflict, civil war, and, in July 2011, the loss of three-quarters of its oil production due to the secession of South Sudan. The oil sector had driven much of Sudan’s GDP growth since 1999. For nearly a decade, the economy boomed on the back of rising oil production, high oil prices, and significant inflows of foreign direct investment. Since the economic shock of South Sudan’s secession, Sudan has struggled to stabilize its economy and make up for the loss of foreign exchange earnings. The interruption of oil production in South Sudan in 2012 for over a year and the consequent loss of oil transit fees further exacerbated the fragile state of Sudan’s economy. Ongoing conflicts in Southern Kordofan, Darfur, and the Blue Nile states, lack basic infrastructure in large areas, and reliance by much of the population on subsistence agriculture, keep close to half of the population at or below the poverty line.
Sudan was subject to comprehensive US sanctions, which were lifted in October 2017. Sudan is attempting to develop non-oil sources of revenues, such as gold mining and agriculture while carrying out an austerity program to reduce expenditures. The world’s largest exporter of gum Arabic, Sudan produces 75-80% of the world’s total output. Agriculture continues to employ 80% of the work force. Sudan introduced a new currency, still called the Sudanese pound, following South Sudan’s secession, but the value of the currency has fallen since its introduction. Khartoum formally devalued the currency in June 2012, when it passed austerity measures that included gradually repealing fuel subsidies. Sudan also faces high inflation, which reached 47% on an annual basis in November 2012 but fell to about 35% per year in 2017.
Sudan’s failure to service its international debt, together with a poor human rights record, led, in 1993, to the World Bank suspending financing of 15 development projects, and to the IMF suspending Sudan’s voting rights in the organization (they were restored in 2000). Sudan was the world’s largest debtor to the IMF in 2003, with arrears of over $1 billion. Total foreign debt exceeds $24 billion, and high inflation has put consumer goods beyond the reach of most. In 2003, the civil war and Sudan’s international isolation continued to inhibit growth in the nonagricultural sectors, although progress on the peace process was being made with strong backing from the international community. Petroleum discoveries in the south-central region of Sudan and their export in 1999 raised hopes of economic salvation, but political instability undermines the prospect for lasting improvement in the economy. The economy, in terms of GDP, grew at an annual rate of 6.32% between 2001 and 2005, largely due to increased oil production, enhanced light industry, and an expansion of export processing zones.

GDP (purchasing power parity):
$186.8 billion (2017 est.)
$180.1 billion (2016 est.)
$174.7 billion (2015 est.)
GDP (official exchange rate):
$119 billion (2017 est.)
GDP – real growth rate:
3.7% (2017 est.)
3.1% (2016 est.)
4.9% (2015 est.)
GDP – per capita (PPP):
$4,600 (2017 est.)
$4,500 (2016 est.)
$4,500 (2015 est.)
Gross national saving:
12.1% of GDP (2017 est.)
11.5% of GDP (2016 est.)
9.1% of GDP (2015 est.)
GDP – composition, by sector of origin:
agriculture: 39.6%
industry: 2.6%
services: 57.8% (2017 est.)
Agriculture – products:
cotton, groundnuts (peanuts), sorghum, millet, wheat, gum Arabic, sugarcane, cassava (manioc, tapioca), mangoes, papaya, bananas, sweet potatoes, sesame seeds; animal feed, sheep and other livestock.
Industries:
oil, cotton ginning, textiles, cement, edible oils, sugar, soap distilling, shoes, petroleum refining, pharmaceuticals, armaments, automobile/light truck assembly, milling.
Population below poverty line:
46.5% (2009 est.)
Budget:
revenues: $8.198 billion
expenditures: $13.4 billion (2017 est.)


Agriculture
Agriculture plays an important role in Sudan economy. It supplies food for the people, employment opportunities and provides the industrial sector with raw materials. Sudan is considered as one of the three countries in the world that can contribute to the international food security. Pre-secession, Sudan has cultivable arable land estimated at 86 million hectares. Post-secession that has been diminished by no less than 35% of the total. However, less than 20% are utilized under three major farming sub-sectors: the irrigated, the semi-mechanized rainfed and the agro-pastoral traditional rain-fed. The agricultural sector has an important role to play in achieving food Security by increasing food production and providing employment opportunities in the rural area.
The poverty is prevalent all over the country, but the measure factors were the ill-conceived
development policies followed since independence which has neglected rural development from which the majority of population derive their live hood, the civil war and natural disasters (drought). The development policies were concentrated on irrigated agriculture which was supplied with most of the services such as stable irrigation, research, extension, credit and other infrastructure. The traditional agriculture was neglected to receive no research services, limited extension, credit, and infrastructure, basic social services in the form of education, primary health care, and safe water supply. Poverty alleviation program was launched in 1992 as a part of 10-years a comprehensive national strategy (1992-2000).
The government has launched the interim Poverty Reduction Strategy paper (2004-2006) as a commitment to strongly address the poverty problem of the country in a sustained manner. The bad performance of the agricultural sector is the maim causal of food insecurity in Sudan besides this the global phenomena like the climate change will also affect the agricultural sector.
Policy reform, include improving the structure of incentives for producers and other stakeholders within the sector and related sectors, reform credit and marketing institutions, rehabilitation and strengthening coordination between national agricultural and livestock research and extension centres and complementary policies in other related sectors, namely, roads, storage, transportation, communication, education, and health.
Fiscal policies, however, should include reductions in taxes and levies, price policies and removal of administrative bottlenecks (Ali, and Elbadawi, 2002). However, the reform included a structure of privatization for all public companies, corporation and most important irrigated agricultural scheme. The latter represented the backbone of the Sudanese agricultural production engine. Privatization resulted in the migration of farmers from those schemes. There was a decline in the ability and willingness of the people to participate in production activities.
The weak performance of the agricultural sector is the main causal of food insecurity in Sudan. Planners and policymakers should take in consideration that tow third of Sudanese work in the agricultural sector, so to reduce the food shortage in the rural areas, and the country as a whole is to develop the agricultural sector particularly the traditional sector which produces more than 60% of cereals. The government interventions can be in packages of researchers and extension in agriculture and livestock, institutional and management reforms, credit services, market accessibility and public investment. Privatization plans should be reconsidered as it partly enhances people from participation and entrench the feelings that they being deprived of their of production resources. These are some interventions needed to overcome the poor performance of the agricultural sector.
Electricity access:
population without electricity: 24,700,000
electrification – total population: 35%
electrification – urban areas: 63%
electrification – rural areas: 21% (2013)
Electricity – production:
12.69 billion kWh (2015 est.)
Electricity – consumption:
10.26 billion kWh (2015 est.)
Electricity – exports:
0 kWh (2016 est.)
Electricity – imports:
N/A (2015 est.)
Electricity – installed generating capacity:
3.736 million kW (2015 est.)
Electricity – from fossil fuels:
34.4% of total installed capacity (2015 est.)
Electricity – from nuclear fuels:
0% of total installed capacity (2015 est.)
Telephones – fixed lines:
total subscriptions: 136,472
subscriptions per 100 inhabitants: less than 1 (July 2016 est.)
Telephones – mobile cellular:
total: 27,807,293
subscriptions per 100 inhabitants: 74 (July 2016 est.)
Internet country code:
.sd
Internet users:
total: 10,284,260.
percent of population: 28.0% (July 2016 est.)
Manufacturing and Industries
Following the development of oil fields in the then southern Sudan from 1998 onward, the economy grew rapidly, reaching levels of 8% per annum. In 2004, FDI reached a respectable 7% of GDP. However, the dramatic fall in oil revenues following the secession of what is now South Sudan in 2011 has impacted heavily on GDP growth, which now stands at -6% for 2013; total GDP was $66,565.9 million in 2013, after $63,152.2 million in 2012 but $67,320.8 million in 2011. Accordingly, GDP per capita was $3,373.0 in 2013 ($3,608.9 in 2012 and $3,524.0 in 2011). With FDI in 2013 at only 3.3% and inflation at around 45%, it is estimated that 25% to 30% of the population is unemployed.
Government participation in the manufacturing sector increased dramatically after the 1969 military coup and the adoption of a policy aimed at placing the country’s economic development in government hands, although private ownership continued. During 1970 and 1971 Khartoum nationalized more than thirty private enterprises. However, to counter the drop in foreign private investment that followed, Nimeiri announced that private capital would again be accorded favorable treatment, and the government passed the Development and Promotion of Industrial Investment Act of 1972, containing even more liberal provisions than precoup legislation.
The textile industry was provided with a 690 percent effective rate of protection in the 1980s. The protective policies for the sector have been ineffective because input supply to the textile firms has been erratic and inadequate due to a number of factors The area under cultivation for cotton has been reduced as a result of the decline in world cotton prices and incentives for sorghum & wheat cultivation (for reasons of food security); demand for the high quality, long-staple Sudanese cotton from abroad remained high; policies in relation to pricing and marketing of cotton have changed after liberalisation.
Cotton was bought at harvest time and distributed to the textile firms in installments. Domestic textile firms were able to buy cotton at prices lower than those prevailing in international markets. After liberalization, textile firms ended up paying the international price for cotton. The current arrangement for marketing cotton is that the Sudanese Cotton Corporation transports cotton to Port Sudan where textile firms make their purchases.
The revival of the textile and clothing industries is unlikely to be achieved by partial and piecemeal policy interventions. Recapturing the national market requires a sector specifically integrated programme. The most pressing policy issues are the followings:
a) The regular flow of locally produced and imported input to textile companies needs to be given the utmost attention. Eliminating cotton supply shortages requires multiple interventions including the expansion of the area under cotton cultivation; re-organization of the current marketing arrangements and elimination of unnecessary transport costs in the delivery of cotton to the textile firms; and provision of financial support to domestic textile firms in the form of low-cost working capital.
b) Obsolete technology is a real problem in the textile sector. The machines are old and the parts cannot be found easily. Apparently, part of the reason for this is that the textile units did not make appropriate allowances for the replacement of depreciating capital equipment. Lack of long-term credit availability is a major constraint in the modernization of the textile plants.
c) Non-price factors such as quality and design are as important, and perhaps more important, for the international competitiveness of the textile and clothing industry. Fashion exerts a good deal of influence in the consumption behaviour of households.

Banking and Finance
The traditional banking system was inherited from the AngloEgyptian condominium (1899-1955). When the National Bank of Egypt opened in Khartoum in 1901, it obtained a privileged position as banker to and for the government, a “semi-official” central bank. Other banks followed, but the National Bank of Egypt and Barclays Bank dominated and stabilized banking in Sudan until after World War II. Post-World War II prosperity created a demand for an increasing number of commercial banks. By 1965 loans to the private sector in Sudan had reached ĢSd55.3 million.
Before Sudanese independence, there had been no restrictions on the movement of funds between Egypt and Sudan, and the value of the currency used in Sudan was tied to that of Egypt. This situation was unsatisfactory to an independent Sudan, which established the Sudan Currency Board to replace Egyptian and British money. It was not a central bank because it did not accept deposits, lend money, or provide commercial banks with cash and liquidity. In 1959 the Bank of Sudan was established to succeed the Sudan Currency Board and to take over the Sudanese assets of the National Bank of Egypt. In February 1960, the Bank of Sudan began acting as the central bank of Sudan, issuing currency, assisting the development of banks, providing loans, maintaining financial equilibrium, and advising the government.
There were originally five major commercial banks (Bank of Khartoum, An Nilein Bank, Sudan Commercial Bank, the People’s Cooperative Bank, and the Unity Bank) but the number subsequently grew. The public was dissatisfied with the commercial banks, however, because they were reluctant to lend capital for long-term development projects. Since the Nimeiri government decreed the 1970 Nationalization of Banks Act, all domestic banks have been controlled by the Bank of Sudan.
In addition, the government established numerous specialized banks, such as the Agricultural Bank of Sudan (1959) to promote agricultural ventures, the Industrial Bank of Sudan (1961) to promote private industry, the Sudanese Estates Bank (1966) to provide housing loans, and the Sudanese Savings Bank established to make small loans particularly in the rural areas. The system worked effectively until the late 1970s and 1980s when the decline in foreign trade, balance-of-payments problems, spiraling external debt, the increase in corruption, and the appearance of Islamic banking disrupted the financial system.
Islamic Banking
The Faisal Islamic Bank, whose principal patron was the Saudi prince, Muhammad ibn Faisal Al Saud, was officially established in Sudan in 1977 by the Faisal Islamic Bank Act. The “open door” policy enabled Saudi Arabia, which had a huge surplus after the 1973 Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) increases in the price of petroleum, to invest in Sudan. Members of the Muslim Brotherhood and its political arm, the National Islamic Front, played a prominent role on the board of directors of the Faisal Islamic Bank, thus strengthening the bank’s position in Sudan. Other Islamic banks followed. As a consequence, both the Ansar and Khatmiyyah religious groups and their political parties, the Umma and the Democratic Unionist Party, formed their own Islamic banks.
Tourism
Very few travelers make it to Sudan, but those who do normally come away raving about the wealth of ancient temples, monuments, and tombs, which includes more pyramids than Egypt itself. They’re so untouched by other visitors that you frequently have to brush away desert sands in order to get a better look at temple frescoes, painted back in a time when this part of the Sahara was still green savannah.
But it’s not just the utter romance of the archaeological sites that captivates. Sudan has some of the world’s best diving along its largely unexplored Red Sea coast, apricot-coloured dunes pierced by the life-giving Nile and, in the south and west, green forested mountains. It’s not just the scenery that you’ll recall long after a visit, but the people, who make up a real ethnic jigsaw puzzle and are some of the friendliest and most welcoming you can ever hope to meet.
The wonderfully evocative Egyptian temple of Soleb is one of the historical highlights of north Sudan. The temple was built in the 14th century BC by Amenhotep III, the same Pharaoh who gave us the famous temples of Luxor in Egypt, and the design and carvings are similar.
The delightfully dilapidated pyramids of Nuri, near Karima, are set among a stormy sea of orange sand. They are some of the most romantic pyramids in Sudan. Dating from around the 7th century BC these are both the oldest and largest pyramids in the country.
There were 300 camels in this group and it takes between one and two months to get them from Darfur to Egypt. These headers are very tough men and told me that they prefer to make the trek in summer because it’s ‘too cold’ in winter.
The seemingly insignificant town of Kerma may have been largely left behind by the rest of the world today, but that wasn’t always the case. This is one of the oldest inhabited towns in Africa and a place of immense historical importance. The area around Kerma has been occupied for at least 8000-10,000 years, but the town reached its peak around 1800-1600 BC when it was capital of the Kingdom of Kush and an important trade center during Egypt’s the Middle Kingdom. It was at this time that Kerma’s kings built two giant mud-brick temples, known as deffufas; the oldest, and arguably largest, mud brick buildings on the continent. The western deffufa in the picture stood about 19m high and stretched 50m long. Nobody is really certain what it was used for but most agree it served a religious purpose.
The modern town of Karima is a dusty Nile-side village of little import today, but that wasn’t always the case. Jebel Barkal, the table-topped mountain hanging on the town’s south side, was sacred ground for the Egyptians at the time of the 18th-dynasty Pharaohs. Both they and the Kushites believed that the mountain was home to the god Amun.
Naga consists of a large and well-preserved temple of Amun dating from the 1st century (pictured) and the Lion Temple dedicated to the lion-headed god Apedemak. The exact purpose of the site remains unclear as it’s located in an area that has never really been inhabited.
There are two main groups of pyramids at Begrawiya, the most famous pyramids in Sudan, separated by several hundred meters of sandy desert. In total there are about 100 pyramids – or remains of pyramids.
The reason many of the pyramids are missing their tops is thanks to a 19th Century Italian ‘archaeologist’ who thought treasure might be contained within. Rather than going about the laborious task of opening them properly he merely chopped the tops off and, somewhat to the surprise of many, he did indeed find treasure!